Faa Or Pixels.com ?

See that box up there that says search discussions?

They are the same site slightly different audiences and pixels has more varied products, o r will anyway.

fine art was the original, and pixels is the clone. they want pixels to be the main site, but google won't have that, and i like the name on here better. though i prefer http://www.MikeSavad.com

but they are the same site, except pixels has phone stuff.

---Mike Savad
MikeSavad.com

If you have a Pixels.com account, you automatically have an FAA , etc etc etc (see Domains - Behind the Scenes).........but.......when we post here at FAA , our images, they can be accessed here at FAA. If you post a Pixels.com image of yours, then it requires a log-in to Pixels from FAA . , for some reason nobody can explain.
Point being........they're the same, but different, lol !, in keeping with the products at each site.......Pixels...all things + art/photography/etc/sculpture?........FAA..art/incl photography,etc,but excluding phone cases.and/or other things like calendars (eventually), gimmicks, etc........................your choice.
Clear as mud?
For now, get yourself signed up at FAA ! And.........that gets you a special "artist website", separate to faa/pixels,etc.

Welcome

She does NOT have to sign up at FAA separately. She is already here and can sign in withe the same email and password she uses at Pixels.

OK,OK......just trying to help......
like I said

"f you have a Pixels.com account, you automatically have an FAA "

I saw that but the last part made it seem like she also needed to sign up here too.

If you pay for the premium account you have your ArtistWebsite and that is the one you should be using for marketing, imho.

Patrice

Go BEHIND THE SCENES / Domains and that will explain all :)

Sorry to be late, i am still searching around, and just find back this thread
Thanks everyone for your answers

There is nothing that makes FAA "fine art" America, and nothing on Pixels, except for phone cases, is different. Confusion reigns - and now, if Mike is right - Google seems to overlook/ignore Pixels - why would you use Pixels - unless you are pushing phone cases?