Thanks for the link. Curious I did not see that. Jason spams me pretty aggressively.
Interesting results, too. Photography at 6%? I would have thought it would be more. But then again, his gallery de-emphasizes photography and I'm wondering if that skewed the results.
And no social media results in marketing efforts - at least not enough to blip the chart? That, too, is interesting.
Is it possible there are two completely separate art universes - one that employs older traditional methods and one that emphasizes online and social media with very little overlap between the two?