Post Your Art For September - No Photos, No Paintings, Sculptures, Or Any Of That ...
Actually, you can post anything.
Frankly, I find the limitations on these threads both insulting and aggravating. My art is neither photographs (although it may start with that) or oil/pastel/acrylic paints - nor is it purely digital. Mine is a mix of many different things. So I don't fit into your tiny little boxes. The "contests" have gotten ridiculous with restrictions ("photography but no digital changes") - huh? That is impossible with a digital camera if you shoot in RAW. And then the insult of "traditional art - no photography or digital!" OK, what is traditional anyway. Cubism? Impressionism? Dali? Escher?
Give me a break. How about if you restrictionists just allow anything that is art - and art is defined by the artist?
Please discuss (that way it is an image thread with discussions).
My most recent examples:
Using photography and digital media, Photoshop, plugins, a WACOM Cintiq and pen tools.
A single photo duplicated over and over to create the symmetrical pattern. Then digital tools as well as some other images interspersed to create a complex and interesting abstract.
One photo, cropped (the power plug) and everything else created using Photoshop, plugins, and my pen tools.
Almost "straight" photography, this is an example of how an image can be developed digitally for a nice effect and yet still look like a photo.
This is a street photography shot treated multiple ways to create a piece to fit in with my current "Uniquely Asheville" Collection. This style is proving popular and sells well at a local gallery.
None of these fits in a box and yet each is art, is it not?