20% off all products!   Sale ends tonight at midnight EST.

Return to Main Discussion Page
Discussion Quote Icon

Discussion

Main Menu | Search Discussions

Search Discussions
 
 

Dan Carmichael

8 Years Ago

Artists Alert: The Return Of Orphan Works

The following was an email. There was no provision in the email to click to view the same thing on a web page, so it is presented here the best way possible.
To research it further, start here:
https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=return+of+orphan+works

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Artists Alert: From the Illustrators Partnership
The Return of Orphan Works
Part 1: "The Next Great Copyright Act"

JULY 1, 2015
For more than a year Congress has been holding hearings for the drafting of a brand new US Copyright Act. At its heart is the return of Orphan Works.

Twice, Orphan Works Acts have failed to pass Congress because of strong opposition from visual artists, spearheaded by the Illustrators Partnership.

Because of this, the Copyright Office has now issued a special call for letters regarding the role of visual art in the coming legislation.

Therefore we're asking all artists concerned with retaining the rights to their work to join us in writing.
When and Where

Deadline: July 23, 2015

You can submit letters online to the Copyright Office here.

Read the Copyright Office Notice of Inquiry.

Read the 2015 Orphan Works and Mass Digitization Report.

Here are the Basic Facts

"The Next Great Copyright Act" would replace all existing copyright law.

It would void our Constitutional right to the exclusive control of our work.

It would "privilege" the public's right to use our work.

It would "pressure" you to register your work with commercial registries.

It would "orphan" unregistered work.

It would make orphaned work available for commercial infringement by "good faith" infringers.

It would allow others to alter your work and copyright these "derivative works" in their own names.

It would affect all visual art: drawings, paintings, sketches, photos, etc.; past, present and future; published and unpublished; domestic and foreign.

Background

The demand for copyright "reform" has come from large Internet firms and the legal scholars allied with them. Their business models involve supplying the public with access to other people's copyrighted work. Their problem has been how to do this legally and without paying artists.

The "reforms" they've proposed would allow them to stock their databases with our pictures. This would happen either by forcing us to hand over our images to them as registered works, or by harvesting unregistered works as orphans and copyrighting them in their own names as "derivative works."

The Copyright Office acknowledges that this will cause special problems for visual artists but concludes that we should still be subject to orphan works law.

The "Next Great Copyright Act" would go further than previous Orphan Works Acts. The proposals under consideration include:

1.) The Mass Digitization of our intellectual property by corporate interests.

2.) Extended Collective Licensing, a form of socialized licensing that would replace voluntary business agreements between artists and their clients.

3.) A Copyright Small Claims Court to handle the flood of lawsuits expected to result from orphan works infringements.

In your letter to the Copyright Office:

It's important that lawmakers be told that our copyrights are our source of income because lobbyists and corporation lawyers have "testified" that once our work has been published it has virtually no further commercial value and should therefore be available for use by the public.

So when writing, please remember:

* It's important that you make your letter personal and truthful.
* Keep it professional and respectful.
* Explain that you're an artist and have been one for x number of years.
* Briefly list your educational background, publications, awards, etc.
* Indicate the field(s) you work in.
* Explain clearly and forcefully that for you, copyright law is not an
abstract legal issue, but the basis on which your business rests.
* Our copyrights are the products we license.
* This means that infringing our work is like stealing our money.
* It's important to our businesses that we remain able to determine
voluntarily how and by whom our work is used.
* Stress that your work does NOT lose its value upon publication.
* Instead everything you create becomes part of your business inventory.
* In the digital era, inventory is more valuable to artists than ever before.

If you are NOT a professional artist:

* Define your specific interest in copyright, and give a few relevant
details.
* You might want to stress that it's important to you that you determine
how and by whom your work is used.
* You might wish to state that even if you're a hobbyist, you would not
welcome someone else monetizing your work for their own profit
without your knowledge or consent.

Because this is a complicated issue, we'll follow up next week with some expanded thoughts of our own.

- Brad Holland and Cynthia Turner
for the Board of the Illustrators Partnership


The Illustrators Partnership has filed multiple papers with the
Copyright Office regarding this issue.

You can download them from the Copyright Office website:

Remedies for Small Copyright Claims
January 17, 2012

Orphan Works and Mass Digitization
Initial Comments, February 3, 2013

Orphan Works and Mass Digitization
Reply Comments, March 6, 2013

Orphan Works and Mass Digitization
Additional Comments, May 21, 2014


Please post or forward this artists alert to any interested party.

Reply Order

Post Reply
 

Dan Carmichael

8 Years Ago

Here is a web link that contains some of the live links that were in the email:

http://ipaorphanworks.blogspot.com/2015/07/the-return-of-orphan-works-part-1-next.html

 

Mike Breau

8 Years Ago

Important read and need to act on-thanks for posting Dan-
Definitely would cause *Major* problems for many,many artists and would undermine the the whole protection process for way too many at the expense of the little guy. Perhaps someone could draft a page for everyone to sign that could be distributed to all groups, or even a mass emails of such a letter by FAA administration, and other Major pod sites and. Individual response my be a trifle too slow. This one surely needs to be nicked in the bud. What might be the view of the major search engines, and which platforms are pushing for this.

 

John Wills

8 Years Ago

Thanks for posting, would like Dan Turner's take on this.

 

Dan Turner

8 Years Ago

Let's first consider the source of the opposition: The Illustrators Partnership. They consider stock houses the "single most destructive development in the history of our profession." They are adamantly opposed to royalty-free stock illustration in any format.

Years ago, they warned artists about allowing their work anywhere near a stock house, because they "flood the market with second-rate work and discounted prices. When clients find they can get art cheap, they come to think of it as cheap art."

They were right, of course, but thousands upon thousands of artists didn't heed the message. They severely underestimated the number of artists who are willing to work for cheap (or free).

Their mission is to prop up falling prices for illustration and to give artists ultimate, final-say control over their commercially commissioned creations.

All in all, theirs is a very tiny part of the reason the copyright office has issued this latest study and invited feedback. Keep in mind this is a study, not a bill, not a formal proposal, not pending legislation. It is also 234 pages long and covers tons of provisions and problems not mentioned by The Illustrators Partnership.



Dan Turner
Dan Turner's Seven Keys to Selling Art Online

 

Mary Beth Landis

8 Years Ago

Interesting to know Dan Turner.

 

This discussion is closed.