Looking for design inspiration?   Browse our curated collections!

Return to Main Discussion Page
Discussion Quote Icon

Discussion

Main Menu | Search Discussions

Search Discussions
 
 

Edward Fielding

9 Years Ago

Art For Money's Sake

Going along with a recent thread about art investment, this NY Times article deals with the idea of buying art purely for investment purposes and the web site "Art Rank" which is like a Moody's for art. It tells you when to buy, sell or hold artwork by artist. How would you like your collectors to be advised to liquidate your work?

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/08/magazine/art-for-moneys-sake.html

Art Prints

"ArtRank. A sort of Jim Cramer for the fine arts, ArtRank uses an algorithm to place emerging artists into buckets including “buy now,” “sell now” and “liquidate.” Carlos Rivera, co-founder and public face of the company, says that the algorithm, which uses online trends as well as an old-fashioned network of about 40 art professionals around the world, was designed by a financial engineer who still works at a hedge fund. The service is limited to 10 clients, each of whom pays $3,500 a quarter for what they hope will be market-beating insights. It’s no surprise that Rivera, 27, who formerly ran a gallery in Los Angeles, is not popular with artists."

Reply Order

Post Reply
 

Dan Turner

9 Years Ago

"Rivera, 27, who formerly ran a gallery in Los Angeles"

I think that tells us what we need to know right there. Anyone can value/de-value art. There are no qualifications, except for knowing how to market yourself.


Dan Turner
Dan Turner's Seven Keys to Selling Art Online

 

Edward Fielding

9 Years Ago

Next phase will be fantasy football for artists.

 

Greg Jackson

9 Years Ago

10 clients, and $35,000 a quarter total income. Not a bad deal...for him.

 

Edward Fielding

9 Years Ago

I don't understand the limit on the clients. Usually in such a set up clients/members share their info and then get access to the total info. 10 sources of info seems rather limited unless this represents most of the high end art market.

 

This discussion is closed.