Looking for design inspiration? Browse our curated collections!
Discussion
9 Years Ago
I am a photographer, and I love art. But I wonder...Is taking a photograph, and even the post processing element of creating a photograph, the same as someone who paints, or sculpts or creates music? Are photographers artists?
Reply Order
9 Years Ago
No it's not the same. A painter uses brushes and paint. A sculptor uses stone or metal and a musician uses a musical instrument. Photographers use cameras.
9 Years Ago
yes your an artist if your using your camera to produce art. what is are is, is left up to debate. beyond that if your a good artist or a bad one is a different story.
conceptual makes no difference. and there are some very artistic landscapes.
if your goal is to take pictures on vacation, then no. if your goal is to take a documentary shot, then also no. if your goal is to produce something unique for the goal of it being art - then yes. if your taking just anything and calling it art, then no.
---Mike Savad
MikeSavad.com
9 Years Ago
so yeah, what exactly is "art" then? I mean can a chef be an artist, or an interior designer, or a knitter of children's sweaters?
9 Years Ago
I think everyone is an artist, or certainly has the potential to be. From there it's a matter of degree. Some are horrible artists. Others develop their talent and skill to create exquisite works of art. The medium ultimately doesn't matter.
From your portfolio, Gregory, I would say you are an artist. And a good one, too!
Dan Turner
Dan Turner's Seven Keys to Selling Art Online
9 Years Ago
Dan-nope there is no bad artist, maybe artist is bad for someone but what is point of estimation ?
9 Years Ago
You are absolutely an artist as a photographer! Yes! Take a college course on photography and film, and you will understand the power of art and photography.
9 Years Ago
Thank you very much Dan! That was very kind of you. I would LOVE to think of myself as an artist, but I wanted to be sure I am not being presumptuous by thinking of myself as one, especially in light of the traditional view of it being painters, and sculptors. Thanks everyone.
9 Years Ago
When did it become a thing to be a photographer, and then not want to be referred to as one? Photography is awesome, I could never do it because I don't think I would like waiting around for proper lighting and slogging through tick infested grass to get to a close up shot of platypus or something. lol so I admire them going out in the fields to get all those glorious shots. Me, I like my couch, and I make all my art from it in complete safety. Food and water just a few steps away. Also, there are far too many flower pictures. ;)
To answer your question, I suppose they are artists, but there has to be some kind of creative process to the shot and not just an applied filter or texture.
9 Years Ago
Wasn't this question discussed and answered over 100 or more years ago? It seems to go on and on endlessly.
The title, "artist" is abused maligned and worshiped today. The word, "artist" is very loaded. So many want to be perceived as creative and innovative no matter what they are doing. You don't need a degree to be or be called an artist. All of that said there are poor artists,good artists and amazing artists. Maybe the breakdown should be hobbyist, amateur and professional, all different in the goals and experience required. No wrong answer just the degree. The discussion will persist it seems. By my own measure I am a technically a poor photographer. I am much more adept practiced and knowledgeable at painting.
9 Years Ago
In my opinion, a person can be both a photographer AND an artist. Combining the two is artistic photography, in my opinion. Most of my pieces start off as a photograph and end up as art. Like these:
If someone tells me I'm not an artist, I tell them they're wrong. :) If they tell me I'm not a photographer, they're wrong, too.
I do what I consider "straight photography" as well...like this:
But I feel in most cases, my straight photos are not different enough and unique enough to stand out in the crowd, which is why I choose to combine my art with them and create an entire new piece from the original photo(s).
9 Years Ago
Mark Getlein proposes six activities, services or functions of contemporary artists:
Create places for some human purpose.
Create extraordinary versions of ordinary objects.
Record and commemorate.
Give tangible form to the unknown.
Give tangible form to feelings.
Refresh our vision and help see the world in new ways.:)
Good Luck everyone!
Cheers,V
9 Years Ago
"Every child is an artist. The problem is how to remain an artist once we grow up." - Pablo Picasso
9 Years Ago
If you read about photography and how to achieve great photographs, you will find that it includes as important, an understanding of elements and principles How to position objects or the camera for best results, and so on, which are also crucial to the creation of art using brushes, paints, pencils, etc. I think anything which requires studied creative input is art, or at least an art form. I see great use of principles in Frank Wilson's work and I admire his work for that reason, not just for the beautiful results he achieves in his photography. As an amateur photographer and an artist with training, I am able to see the art in photography quite easily and I know it's not just a matter of aiming a camera and taking a shot.
9 Years Ago
It's all art, and in the first tier it doesn't matter how or what or why.
You can sketch in charcoal, pencil, or crayon; you can sketch in mud or the sand with a stick; you can sketch in the frost on a window, in the dust on a windscreen, or carve into a desk; you can even sketch in the snow with a golden stream.
Similarly you can take a photograph with a pinhole or a refined lens, a plastic lens, a magnifying glass; You can do it on a processed plank of wood; or even explore polaroid, daguerretype, black and white, good quality film or rubbish five years past its use-by date. You can hold a flame to the negative to make it bubble, you can stretch it, warp it, overlay it, scar it in any number of ways. You can use a purpose built digital, a camera phone, or even a cheap spy watch.
Likewise the subject, which may be manipulated to create what they envision or an accidental discovery happily stumbled upon in the process of experimenting.
But what makes it good? Philosophically it's all good - but where's the fun in that?
There's a more complex argument about it merely being different making it good - but instinct and experience tells us otherwise. Though it may sometimes be the case, it doesn't necessarily follow.
It's not about the time it took, the reputation of the artist(s), the method(s), the tricks, nor the level of detail, though a combination of these may assist in analysis.
It doesn't matter if it's an unidentifiable abstract, an opus of high surrealism, a manipulated photosequence, enhanced with filters or multimedia techniques.
BUT - if it's the pursuit of beauty there are some subjects which regardless of how cliched they may have become, shouldn't be overlooked by anyone interested in exploring every facet of the medium for the purpose of expression / discovery / relating a tale however vague.
The overuse of flowers and sunsets which have been criticised extensively recently are a case in point. They tell their own story, and simple it may be, but should it be dismissed due to - ah - overexposure? No. Do it if it interests you. Do it well, do it badly post the product to the far corners of the internet. Be glad if it sparks someone's imagination: let them comment, repost, nick it and be thankful for an audience.
But I need to sell it! I need money to continue! I've heard this pained refrain so often that I'm here to tell you that it is the one subject more boring than anything else in the crazy hazy world of art.
If you really want to become a millionaire from art, forget art - open a restaurant instead. Food is a necessity, art is an entertainment. They're equally important, but one is largely free, and more freely available than the other.
Once you've designated the cuisine, decided on the menu, hired a chef, then line the walls with your pictures and wait for a patron to consume enough wine to really want to purchase that photo he'd been subconsciously eyeing all evening, and has now formed an insurperable emotional attachment to.
This, but also you get to eat tax deductably.
"Sounds great - but wait - wouldn't that compromise my artistic credibility?" Well, the answer is maybe, but not as much as starving to death...
:)
9 Years Ago
Development,as artist, is started when you are young, like and enjoy the world as is.
After that you trying to click,fix,and change something and you are in love with your skills.
Next level is your creativity landing on commercial ground and people like what you do,
willing pay money upfront. Now you are big artist...
9 Years Ago
If a photographer composes a shot, and the composition was skillful, that alone is using an "artist's eye". In fact there are many "crossover" skills used in painting and photography.
If a photographer "sets up a shot", that too is another skill used in art.
What about lighting, directing the viewer's eye, telling a story and doing it skillfully... Balancing elements such as color or shades, etc. Bravely risking life and limb for a shot!
In everything there are degrees of difficulty, talent, skill, discipline, passion, dedication, on and on... It may be subjective to say that something is art regardless of the medium. Remember the first few weeks of every season of "America's Got Talent", and they have people who can not sing a lick but think they can. They may be trying to sing, but we know they'll never make it as an artist. They may have passion or even dedication, but that isn't always enough.
When I saw the question posed by this thread I remembered the same subject appearing before and before and before and I remember myself thinking the same thing each time... why is this even a question to be debated? (no offense).
9 Years Ago
I am sorry Thomas, if you feel that I am baiting. I actually started thinking about from an article I read from Digital Photographers online. My aim is true. Why so cynical?
Big Skip
This is a very popular discussion with 77 responses. In order to help the page load faster and allow you to quickly read the most recent posts, we're only showing you the oldest 25 posts and the newest 25 posts. Everything in the middle has been skipped. Want to read the entire discussion? No problem: click here.
9 Years Ago
Thank you to everyone who is responding, as I am learning a lot from you all. I sincerely wanted to know what people thought, to help me shape how I see myself as a photographer. You are helping me, thank you.
9 Years Ago
“Art is what we call...the thing an artist does.
It's not the medium or the oil or the price or whether it hangs on a wall or you eat it. What matters, what makes it art, is that the person who made it overcame the resistance, ignored the voice of doubt and made something worth making. Something risky. Something human.
Art is not in the ...eye of the beholder. It's in the soul of the artist.”
― Seth Godin
9 Years Ago
To Grigorios Moraitis- Francis of Assisi quote:
Sorry didn't mean to copy your post. I just hadn't scrolled far enough down to see your post. At least you confirmed I got the quote right. :)
9 Years Ago
Edward Fielding, that is the best quote on what art is that I have ever seen! That answers my original question conclusively, thank you.
9 Years Ago
This question will never be answered - only opinions can be given. What is 'art' is purely subjective.
9 Years Ago
If the end result pleases you..it matters not how you got there..or what you or others call it. If people buy it..bonus! Create with whatever tool fits your imagination!
9 Years Ago
art is up to you. but you can usually tell by comparison what is art and what is not. and if you can't, then it doesn't matter.
---Mike Savad
MikeSavad.com
9 Years Ago
Yes! Absolutely! A photographer IS an artist! It is an art to paint with light and capture that with a camera. A camera is a tool...just as the paintbrush is a tool. It takes skill, talent, and an artistic eye to capture a moment with a press of a shutter button. It takes artistic talent and knowledge to correctly process the photo whether in a darkroom or with digital software. Anyone who says photographers are not artists...are horribly wrong!
9 Years Ago
People seem to want the tools that a person uses as a definition as to whether they are an artist or not. Personally I feel that an artist is someone that uses the tools they are given to make something visually appealing or dramatic. I don't like the arrogance of people that refuse to accept photographers as "true" artists because of the tools they use. It is not just a matter of snapping a picture. As Ansel Adams said, great photographs are "created". What the camera does is only a small part of the equation. What someone does with the camera is what makes it art. Knowing perspective, color, balance, drama and an artistic eye can create some of the greatest photographs that can fulfil the same emotion that a drawing or painting can. Snapping a picture is one thing, being an artist no matter the tools is another.
I am an artist/photographer. I went to art school and learned what it was about. I see no difference between photography and painting when it come to the creative mind. It's the person using the tools, not the tools themselves that make art.
9 Years Ago
The answer is no, not on this site, and neither are painters or sculptors, etc. On this site - we are POD salesmen. You are not an artist just because you work at a framing shop and the boss lets you hang a couple of your own prints on the wall to help sell. You are a framer. I am not a musician just because I play a guitar. If I write a song I could be considered an artist. If I sell the song, quit the frame shop and go on tour, I am a musician. If you want to know if you are an artist, take your work to the streets and see if it sells without a frame. I can tell you there are few pieces on this site that would sell on the streets of Paris and I don't think Vincent would care one way or another if he saw his work on a throw pillow, as long as he got a taste.
9 Years Ago
I think it's time to stop following this link now. I have to find a place to put my feet up 'cause it's getting deep in here.
9 Years Ago
Even if you're just photographing something pretty, there's at least one conceptual judgement going on that it is "pretty", whatever that means. I think any such expression is art.
9 Years Ago
"John Crothers15 Days Ago
No it's not the same. A painter uses brushes and paint. A sculptor uses stone or metal and a musician uses a musical instrument. Photographers use cameras."
So, a painter learns their craft, and uses tools called brushes, and paint. A sculptor learns their craft, and uses hammers, chisels, cutting torches, and welding tools. A musician learns their craft, and uses a tool called an instrument. But, a photographers simply "use a camera"? That has to be the least thought out argument I have heard ever.
Photographers have the most difficult craft to learn of any artist. We don't have the luxury of making anything at all. We must photograph something that actually exists, and then are constantly asked ridiculous questions like, "how I know it looked like that?", by the viewer. Why is it the Mona Lisa is art, when she never really existed, but an artistic photograph of someone who does exist "is just a photograph"? Don't even get me started with Picasso.
"Don't capture images. Create photographs."
~ Daniel Kmiecik
9 Years Ago
I believe this particular argument is over a hundred years old. I suspect it will not be solved here to everyone's satisfaction.
My question is, if you care about others definition of this, is why?
9 Years Ago
I agree with Mr. Kateley and a few others. Being an artist isn't necessarily dependent on what others think of your work; it's what you think of it, and how it makes you feel. If someone takes a picture of a sky, and he or she is moved by it, then yes, it is art work to them, and no one else can change that. My opinion is, if you go by how your heart feels, anything you do can become art.
9 Years Ago
HW Kately and John Clark,
I agree completely, as you can tell by the closing in my About page at onyonet.com:
"My art comes from my heart, and soul, so you can feel it in yours".
I just get tired of hearing photography have to fight to be considered art by the public at large. I even see photographers, who do beautiful work, struggle to believe their own photo is artwork.
As I write this HW, I realize, I just need to be more flexible. I'll keep creating photographs, rather than capturing images, and keep following my own closing, with your words in my head the whole time. Thanks for that. I really do appreciate it.
Daniel
9 Years Ago
As a photographer, I have come to appreciate that great images are not just the result of "taking a picture of a nice scene". In the field, the photographer must make countless creative decisions all of which affect the final image. Similarly, after the image has been captured in the camera, there are countless more choices to be made in post processing. But it's not done yet. Then there are choices to be made during the printing process to get the image to come out the way you want it. So is the photographer an artist? I think so! As an aspiring photographer, I have come to appreciate all that goes into the creation of a beautiful image.
9 Years Ago
HW, exactly.
Seeking answers, looking for validation, needing recognition is a trivial pursuit.
I maintain that if it isn't authentic,it isn't art....and if you get distracted by the above, your true task is to recover what makes you authentic. Without it, all else that follows will be phony.
9 Years Ago
Well...are you an artist who uses a camera as part of your tool set? Or are you a photographer who sometimes produces an "arty" shot?
Dan Turner
Dan Turner's Seven Keys to Selling Art Online
9 Years Ago
When concepts such composition, color considerations, etc. are applied to photography in a way comparable to a painting or other form of art, then yes, the photography is art and the photographer an artist.