Key Words - Images Not Showing Up When Searched

make sure you wait 24 hours and then some before you see it. if there are more than 10,000 and you don't sell often it may not show up.

---Mike Savad
MikeSavad.com

They were uploaded November 04 and it's weird because
they all show under the used search phrase 'twin peaks san Francisco', but not under the used search phrase 'twin peaks'

sean mentioned that the search will weigh more heavily on words in a certain order. looking a the list, twin peaks is way down on the list, i'm guessing that's the reason.


---Mike Savad
MikeSavad.com

.

erased only because someone here is only trying to get others in trouble.


---Mike Savad
MikeSavad.com

Okay so put Twin Peaks at the top of the list? I will try that. Currently there is only three pages of images with the search term twin peaks so it's strange that it wouldn't show up at all.

you can give it a shot anyway. oddly you both have it in about the same place. also insert it as twin,peaks. in case it's doing something odd with phrases.

http://fineartamerica.com/art/all/twin%252C+peaks/all twin, peaks gives you totally different results

http://fineartamerica.com/art/all/%2522twin+peaks%2522/all "twin peaks" different results

http://fineartamerica.com/art/all/peaks+twin/all peaks twin also different.

yeah, the mystery continues.


---Mike Savad
MikeSavad.com

"sure are a lot of copyright violations for the word though."

Really Mike? You are going to go there again?

I only see one artist come up on the search for "Twin Peaks". You want to tell him he has all those copyright violations?

i reported it floyd. i'm pretty sure lifting it from a tv set violates copyright.

is that all you came in here for floyd?


---Mike Savad
MikeSavad.com

There's one artist for that search because if you click through to the artist profile, their "name" is Twin Peaks. It's returning the results for one artist.

It's usually a good thing that it matches the artist because if someone searches for Jane DoeArtist they're probably looking for a specific artist's work. But you have weird instances like this where an artist name matches another search term where it's not such a good result. Send this example to support so they can address. Moving your keyword around won't change the results for this one until support addresses this one individually.

You made a accusation in a public forum again, before you had the facts.

If you don't want to be called out for doing unethical things, stop doing them.

What I come here for is none of your business and is not the issue.

You calling people a law breaker with no proof is the issue here. I actually think that you are breaking the law by making public accusations of wrong doing with no proof.

Just because you reported it does not men you can then go call the guy a crook. What kind of stupid are you??? lol

And yes, by all means, report this thread and my comments to Abbie.

I would do it myself but I am sure you already have! lol

Thank you Mark, I'll send a ticket to support.

floyd mind your own business.


---Mike Savad
MikeSavad.com

I find it hard to believing that Twin Peaks is not being used by a lot of other people, enough for more images then just one artist's work would show up in the search.

No problem, Jennifer. I've encountered other ones like this before and support has always resolved the issue. The search matches the name on that one person's account so it's just defaulting to only their work. Usually a good thing but not in this case.

Having you going around FAA calling other people crooks is my business. It should be everyone's business that is on FAA.

You keep doing that and sooner or later you are going to offend the wrong person.

Maybe I'll shoot that guy an email and see how he likes you calling him a crook. lol

did i call anyone a crook?

"What kind of stupid are you???" -- that's what you called me - LOL meaningless. your simply attacking me while pretending your some kind of super hero. but in reality your harassing me.

the only person who said crook - is you, and your interpretation of it. and go right ahead and tell him anything you want, ask where those images came from. offend the wrong person? how so? i have no idea.

do you have an explanation, or are you trying to veer yet another thread off course?


---Mike Savad
MikeSavad.com

"did i call anyone a crook?"

Yes, you did. Your accuse him of copyright violations. That would make him a crook.

I don't need an explanation. The thread itself is all the explanation that anyone with any common sense would need.

That you can't see that is a big part of the problem.

Mike
Floyd

Pack it in

BOTH of you are breaking the rules

And talk about harassing some one, don't you think accusing a person of copyright violations is serious form of harassment?

No, I bet you don't.

You harassed that gal yesterday because you didn't like here group or her contests. The you harassed the gal later that day because you didn't like her idea. You demeaned her and your argument and based you opinion on either a outright lie or a lie based on ignorance. Either way you were wrong an you were out of line.

You do this all the time.

You have a lot of people fooled into thinking YOU are the super hero. Not me. You just can't handle the fact that I am not impressed nor afraid of stepping on you cape! lol

Abbie do I need to send a ticket or can you fix my problem from here?

ops! sorry just seen that Abbie...