20% off all products! Sale ends tonight at midnight EST.
Discussion
9 Years Ago
Have any of you ever had a work that somehow became controversial despite your intentions? I had a work in a show I was doing at a county government center in which a heated argument broke out among a couple of viewers. One thought one of my paintings was satanic while the other felt it was deeply religious. I had done the painting as a way to poke fun of science!
Reply Order
9 Years Ago
Oh, yes, Ron! My painting below was not originally named "Ballz" A designer hung it in a client's home and it was returned to me because the client saw male genitalia in it.
It's all in the eyes of the beholder and I ended up painting another one expressly for her instead....but I just had to rename it, in honor of the great story now attached!
It has a coveted place in my home since then....I didn't really wanna sell it anyway! lol.
9 Years Ago
Ronald, yes I have had that very thing happen, it was with a series of sculpture that were meant to point out the suffering war causes. I would post it here but the last time I posted the image to more than one thread here even though it was on topic to the threads I was posting to, I was banned from posting for "spamming" of all things, for a week. So I will not post it here even though I think it would most certainly fit the topic you are discussing because I have it posted in another open themed image thread now. The Sculpture is titled "STOP" and can be seen in my gallery. I did make the series to be thought provoking, as that is what I think art should do at times, not just be pretty, but make a meaningful statement or convey something of truth regardless of it being the popular ideology of the day or not.Many things that were hailed in history as the popular ideology of the time are things that today are outlawed, so therefore I believe that there is a very valid reason that justifies art that has the potential to be viewed as controversial even if the controversy is not misplaced, if it further leads to positive change is society. That being said controversy in art simply for the "shock" effect to gain attention is a totally different thing.
Now here is another one that I to thought was just a fun piece and had no notion of it being controversial until I received a compliment on it that something to the effect of it being controversial. To me it only proves that people have different views on art as they do about any other subject under the sun.
9 Years Ago
Seems as if a quick look and hasty decisions often lead to the misunderstanding of a work of art.
9 Years Ago
It just seems to me that more and more things in society are being funneled into the categories of religion and politics when in actuality they don't belong there.
9 Years Ago
Drew?
sorry, i' guess there's a joke there somewhere but I missed it.
Mario, regarding your piece, if you include a Magen David, it's religion.
9 Years Ago
Marlene, but is it a Magen David as you call it ? or is it the symbol of intertwined equilateral triangles which are a common one in the Middle East and North Africa, and is thought to bring good luck. It appears occasionally in early Jewish artwork, but never as an exclusively Jewish symbol.
9 Years Ago
That is also the argument for a swastika....'but, but, but. it is also an ancient something or another.'
Magen David is a star of David,the shield of King David.... a most common symbol of Judaism..MUCH more than "appears occasionally in ancient Judaism" It is a MAJOR symbol of my faith TODAY, as it has been for thousands of years....so yes, Very controversial to use it.
And this is borderline religious talk which I don't want to see Ron's thread be closed over. ;)
9 Years Ago
:-) Yes, we probably are tip-toeing the lines. Please, there's so many other things we can discuss.
9 Years Ago
It would be controversial to use it in a controversial way, but please read what I wrote about the piece we are talking about in the other thread it should clear up any controversy, I was allowed to post the image but I was also advised not discuss it beyond what it is, a sculpture, so I won't. But if you feel more needs to be said about it Marlene, by all means Private message me about it and you will see exactly that there is no controversy about it, and if there is, it's gonna fall under what we are discussing here in this very thought provoking concept Ronald's thread calls "Misplaced Controversy"
9 Years Ago
@ Marlene: You wouldn't and what evs!
Why would one paint anything that was not a study; something not controversial? Controversy is what make good art great! otherwise, its just decorative and/or illustrative.You know..goes with the furniture and makes one feel warm and fuzzy.
9 Years Ago
Drew, it was your Richard comment that the' huh 'was attached to.
Mario, I just have one question for you to answer on your own, for yourself...IF you were using the Magen David as a symbol of good luck, why would you use the word STOP above it? That is what confuses. Surely you didn't mean to stop good luck....
9 Years Ago
Drew wrote: "...its just decorative and/or illustrative.You know..goes with the furniture and makes one feel warm and fuzzy."
Seriously? All right, Drew, before my ornery and formerly nicotine-stained trigger-finger starts a-twitching, why don't you clarify that statement by giving us your definition of the word 'illustrative.'
9 Years Ago
Thank heaven you arrived, Patrick! My most favorite artists on faa, who have my eternal admiration started out as or are currently illustrators.
9 Years Ago
Ronald, here is a link to a very interesting article about Misplaced Art Controversy which lead to censorship even in a well know museum.
http://middleeast.about.com/od/israelandpalestine/a/me080630.htm
9 Years Ago
Marlene , I already know the answer, but it's you who does not or are curious or already formed an opinion about it, like I said private message me if you really want to know and I will explain. You will be pleasantly surprised.
9 Years Ago
Marlene, the name "Dick" is short for Richard, I think that's what the joke was about lol, so if your your "Ballz" piece was hanging below a picture of a man named Richard.....well you get the jest.
9 Years Ago
I'm not certain what's going on here, but it does seem a bit...controversial; and by the way, thanks, Marlene! You're a peach!
Big Skip
This is a very popular discussion with 128 responses. In order to help the page load faster and allow you to quickly read the most recent posts, we're only showing you the oldest 25 posts and the newest 25 posts. Everything in the middle has been skipped. Want to read the entire discussion? No problem: click here.
9 Years Ago
Oh for (insert generic non-deity)'s sake! We wouldn't want anyone to actually say anything interesting!
9 Years Ago
Gee Marlene, as artists we tend to think close to home and about our environment. However... a few years back when China was on a purge against the Falun Gong they sentenced an artist to prison for painting... a flower. In some way this represented resistance against the Communist State.It is difficult for most of us here to think of controversial art that doesn't contain elements of sex, politics, or religion.
9 Years Ago
Methinks Doctor Drew's brain-droppings are as cryptic as his artwork; 'tis a riddle, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma.
No doubt, he has put the Type 40, Mark 1 d'TARDIS to much good use. ;-)
9 Years Ago
Patrick, you really need to stop hounding. Your obsessing dude! Your IP address has left it's mark all throughout my portfolio. Take ten deep breaths (not near the turpentine ) and say to yourself Alm......Alm. .....
9 Years Ago
Sorry you missed the humor, Drew. Perhaps I may have been too...cryptic?
PS: My sincere apologies, Drew; though I tried not to track too much mud through your portfolio as I went in search of some artwork that I might acquire, alas...there was none for sale.
9 Years Ago
Yes, Kevin, however this discussion started based on the OP question of our own personal experience. ;)
Ron, I have no problems at all with layers...it's the mainstay of several of my series, just to clarify m previous comments. Lots of confusing layers just make for more confusion.
9 Years Ago
Well, in my personal experience I have never done jail time for any art I made. Though perhaps I should have. Eh, eh.
9 Years Ago
When it comes to art, one man's confusion is another mans enlightenment. We can't say we are for freedom of artistic expression and then as soon as we encounter art we don't like or we find personally offensive we attack it or cry foul or discredit the artist or worse request that the art be censored or banned.
9 Years Ago
I have noi idea. And to manipulate a fractal like this takes time, and examining every detail. This was the first fully manipulated fractal I did.
9 Years Ago
It's in my nature, Drew, as I am most definitely a Bluetick Coonhound who, like you, has learned a great deal about the dynamics of figure drawing by studying the work of Burne Hogarth.
9 Years Ago
Robert, I love that image. Dan I have painted my wife many times starting 41 years ago. Some she likes, some not so much. I love her 50th year portrait, she does not. For some reason, which she can not explain my own self portraits as famous people irritate the dickens out of her. Go figure.
Abbie, I am working on one you are sure to identify with. Stay tuned.
9 Years Ago
Robert,
I know some Marines that probably wouldn't care for the title you've assigned to the image.
9 Years Ago
Titles are interesting. I think you can take an innocent image and title it in such a way as to create major controversy. Image is the same, title changes perception.
9 Years Ago
Ronald, you are so correct. Because of your thread I have given this a lot of thought. The images and the titles of much of my work are often based on 3 things: art history, literature, and popular culture. This leads to the fact that if one has no understanding of those 3 things, then they can only respond to the image on its own. In a way it is like showing a full format movie on TV with the sides cut off, it's still a good movie, but you miss a lot.
And Greg, Robert did not create the person, he merely captured the moment. If the Marines were to become upset, they should reach out to her and not be irritated with the art.